<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1014 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334996</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the petitioner&#039;s writ petition, affirming the revenue&#039;s jurisdiction to recover the admitted tax liability despite the return being declared invalid. The court upheld the legality of bank account attachment and denied the refund claim for advance tax and self-assessment tax, citing that tax payments represent admitted liabilities and are not refundable solely due to return invalidation. The petition was dismissed without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2016 19:53:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=449051" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1014 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334996</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the petitioner&#039;s writ petition, affirming the revenue&#039;s jurisdiction to recover the admitted tax liability despite the return being declared invalid. The court upheld the legality of bank account attachment and denied the refund claim for advance tax and self-assessment tax, citing that tax payments represent admitted liabilities and are not refundable solely due to return invalidation. The petition was dismissed without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334996</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>