<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 1013 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334995</link>
    <description>The court directed the tax department to verify the petitioner&#039;s claim for a refund of double tax payment, as evidenced by documents submitted. The department was instructed to make a decision promptly, with a refund to be issued within 45 days if the petitioner&#039;s claim was valid. The court emphasized the importance of transparency and accountability in handling such refund requests, underscoring the need for timely action by the tax authorities.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2016 20:02:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=449050" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 1013 - MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334995</link>
      <description>The court directed the tax department to verify the petitioner&#039;s claim for a refund of double tax payment, as evidenced by documents submitted. The department was instructed to make a decision promptly, with a refund to be issued within 45 days if the petitioner&#039;s claim was valid. The court emphasized the importance of transparency and accountability in handling such refund requests, underscoring the need for timely action by the tax authorities.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334995</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>