https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334995 Where an assessee alleged double deposit of TDS under Section 194-IA and the claim remained pending for years, the HC directed the department to verify the refund request on production of the order copy and supporting documents. If entitlement was established, refund was to be granted within the stipulated time; if not, the authority had to reject the claim by a speaking order recording reasons. The petition was thus disposed of by requiring departmental examination of the double-payment claim and consequential refund on proof of eligibility. en-us Mon, 12 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 Nov 2016 20:02:38 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334995 Where an assessee alleged double deposit of TDS under Section 194-IA and the claim remained pending for years, the HC directed the department to verify the refund request on production of the order copy and supporting documents. If entitlement was established, refund was to be granted within the stipulated time; if not, the authority had to reject the claim by a speaking order recording reasons. The petition was thus disposed of by requiring departmental examination of the double-payment claim and consequential refund on proof of eligibility. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 12 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334995