https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334975 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal on 13/04/2016, ruling against M/s. Midas Care Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. in their challenge to denial of benefit under Notification No.6/94 and rejection of refund claim based on unjust enrichment. The Tribunal held that the appellant's argument of price uniformity did not prove non-passing of duty incidence as required by Section 11B, emphasizing the need to consider all relevant factors. Citing legal precedents, the Tribunal upheld the decision of the original adjudicating authority, denying the appellant's refund claim. en-us Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 24 Nov 2016 19:16:10 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334975 The Tribunal dismissed the appeal on 13/04/2016, ruling against M/s. Midas Care Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd. in their challenge to denial of benefit under Notification No.6/94 and rejection of refund claim based on unjust enrichment. The Tribunal held that the appellant's argument of price uniformity did not prove non-passing of duty incidence as required by Section 11B, emphasizing the need to consider all relevant factors. Citing legal precedents, the Tribunal upheld the decision of the original adjudicating authority, denying the appellant's refund claim. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 13 Apr 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334975