<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 978 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334960</link>
    <description>HC held that input tax credit claimed by respondent-assessee is allowable based on the VAT invoice despite goods being sold at prices lower than invoiced due to discounts/incentives from dealers. Relying on prior authority, the court found ITC entitlement is determined by the invoice and not the subsequent sale value. The petition challenging the allowance was dismissed and the decision affirmed in favor of the respondent-assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2025 18:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448967" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 978 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334960</link>
      <description>HC held that input tax credit claimed by respondent-assessee is allowable based on the VAT invoice despite goods being sold at prices lower than invoiced due to discounts/incentives from dealers. Relying on prior authority, the court found ITC entitlement is determined by the invoice and not the subsequent sale value. The petition challenging the allowance was dismissed and the decision affirmed in favor of the respondent-assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334960</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>