<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 977 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334959</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the penalty imposed by the Tax Board for carrying goods without a complete declaration Form VAT-47, despite the petitioner&#039;s argument that a fresh complete form should suffice. The court emphasized the importance of proper documentation and compliance with VAT laws, citing relevant judgments. The petition was dismissed as the court found no merit in the arguments presented, referencing previous cases supporting the Tax Board&#039;s decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2016 13:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448966" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 977 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334959</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the penalty imposed by the Tax Board for carrying goods without a complete declaration Form VAT-47, despite the petitioner&#039;s argument that a fresh complete form should suffice. The court emphasized the importance of proper documentation and compliance with VAT laws, citing relevant judgments. The petition was dismissed as the court found no merit in the arguments presented, referencing previous cases supporting the Tax Board&#039;s decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334959</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>