<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1179 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188286</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue, citing precedent that credit is admissible on MS items used for the fabrication or erection of capital goods. The judgment emphasized the importance of examining the actual usage of items in the manufacturing process rather than technical classifications.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2016 12:28:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448944" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1179 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188286</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the Commissioner (Appeals) and dismissed the appeal filed by the Revenue, citing precedent that credit is admissible on MS items used for the fabrication or erection of capital goods. The judgment emphasized the importance of examining the actual usage of items in the manufacturing process rather than technical classifications.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188286</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>