<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (1) TMI 1180 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188287</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellants, emphasizing the necessity of issuing a show-cause notice before denying CENVAT credit on MS items. The rejection of the refund claim without the initial notice was deemed improper. The case was remanded for de novo adjudication to allow the appellants a fair opportunity to present their case and justify the admissibility of the credit. Due process was highlighted as crucial in such proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2016 12:28:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448943" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (1) TMI 1180 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188287</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found in favor of the appellants, emphasizing the necessity of issuing a show-cause notice before denying CENVAT credit on MS items. The rejection of the refund claim without the initial notice was deemed improper. The case was remanded for de novo adjudication to allow the appellants a fair opportunity to present their case and justify the admissibility of the credit. Due process was highlighted as crucial in such proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188287</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>