https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188271 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision, declaring Rule 4(A) and part of Rule 5 unconstitutional due to discrimination and violation of Article 14. Existing admissions were preserved, and new rules consistent with the judgment and Article 14 were permitted. The Court rejected collegewise institutional preference, emphasizing merit-based admissions. Requests for admission based on merit were considered if seats were available, and the appeals were dismissed without costs. en-us Tue, 07 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Nov 2016 16:58:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188271 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision, declaring Rule 4(A) and part of Rule 5 unconstitutional due to discrimination and violation of Article 14. Existing admissions were preserved, and new rules consistent with the judgment and Article 14 were permitted. The Court rejected collegewise institutional preference, emphasizing merit-based admissions. Requests for admission based on merit were considered if seats were available, and the appeals were dismissed without costs. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 07 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188271