https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188270 The definition of "illicit traffic" under the NDPS Act is broad and extends to financing, directly or indirectly, activities covered by that definition. Sections 24 and 27A address external dealings in narcotic drugs and financing or harbouring connected with illicit traffic, respectively. On the investigation material, the possibility of laundering and hawala funds being used to facilitate illicit traffic could not be ruled out, and the petitioner's role in financing such activity was not ex facie excluded. The accused had been produced before the competent court and remand was authorised by speaking orders that were not separately challenged. The jurisdictional challenge therefore failed, and the petition was dismissed. en-us Fri, 21 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Nov 2016 16:57:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188270 The definition of "illicit traffic" under the NDPS Act is broad and extends to financing, directly or indirectly, activities covered by that definition. Sections 24 and 27A address external dealings in narcotic drugs and financing or harbouring connected with illicit traffic, respectively. On the investigation material, the possibility of laundering and hawala funds being used to facilitate illicit traffic could not be ruled out, and the petitioner's role in financing such activity was not ex facie excluded. The accused had been produced before the competent court and remand was authorised by speaking orders that were not separately challenged. The jurisdictional challenge therefore failed, and the petition was dismissed. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 21 May 2010 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188270