https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5806 Exemption under section 10(29) for income connected with warehousing was left unresolved because the Court found conflicting precedents on whether interest income and other incidental receipts, as well as income from sources other than letting of godowns or warehouses, fall within the exemption for AY 1981-82. Earlier special leave petitions had been dismissed on one line of authority, but a later contrary decision created uncertainty on the scope of the provision. The Court therefore did not decide the substantive tax issue and directed that the matter be placed before the Chief Justice for consideration by a larger Bench. en-us Wed, 23 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 25 Feb 2015 18:47:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5806 Exemption under section 10(29) for income connected with warehousing was left unresolved because the Court found conflicting precedents on whether interest income and other incidental receipts, as well as income from sources other than letting of godowns or warehouses, fall within the exemption for AY 1981-82. Earlier special leave petitions had been dismissed on one line of authority, but a later contrary decision created uncertainty on the scope of the provision. The Court therefore did not decide the substantive tax issue and directed that the matter be placed before the Chief Justice for consideration by a larger Bench. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 23 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5806