<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 957 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334939</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, confirming the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of additions under sections 14A and 36(1)(va). The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of the AO recording clear dissatisfaction before applying Rule 8D and upheld the allowance of PF and ESI contributions paid before the return filing date. The decision aligns with judicial precedents ensuring fair application of tax laws.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2016 14:54:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448888" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 957 - ITAT LUCKNOW</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334939</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, confirming the CIT(A)&#039;s deletion of additions under sections 14A and 36(1)(va). The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of the AO recording clear dissatisfaction before applying Rule 8D and upheld the allowance of PF and ESI contributions paid before the return filing date. The decision aligns with judicial precedents ensuring fair application of tax laws.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334939</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>