<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 954 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334936</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeals for statistical purposes, remanding the issues of unexplained sales and &#039;on money&#039; receipt back to the AO for fresh examination. The Tribunal directed the AO to allow the assessee an opportunity to provide evidence on the market value of the shops. The Tribunal upheld the deletion of double additions for specific shops in A.Y. 2010-11 to avoid double counting. The order was pronounced on 27th July 2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 19 Nov 2016 12:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448885" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 954 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334936</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeals for statistical purposes, remanding the issues of unexplained sales and &#039;on money&#039; receipt back to the AO for fresh examination. The Tribunal directed the AO to allow the assessee an opportunity to provide evidence on the market value of the shops. The Tribunal upheld the deletion of double additions for specific shops in A.Y. 2010-11 to avoid double counting. The order was pronounced on 27th July 2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334936</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>