<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 949 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334931</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, permitting the depreciation claim of Rs. 4,31,432 disallowed by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). However, the addition of Rs. 1,50,000 for household expenses was upheld. The general ground raised was deemed unnecessary for adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2016 14:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448880" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 949 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334931</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, permitting the depreciation claim of Rs. 4,31,432 disallowed by the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). However, the addition of Rs. 1,50,000 for household expenses was upheld. The general ground raised was deemed unnecessary for adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334931</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>