https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334918 The tribunal allowed both appeals, setting aside the impugned order and directing the original authority to re-examine the case due to various lacunae. Issues regarding re-classification of services, taxability of consideration, errors in computation, scrutiny of agreements, eligibility for exemption, and imposition of penalties were addressed. The tribunal emphasized the need for proper reasoning and scrutiny of agreements, documentation, and compliance with the Finance Act. The original authority was instructed to complete proceedings within three months, considering the prolonged pendency of the case. en-us Wed, 23 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 23 Nov 2016 14:24:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334918 The tribunal allowed both appeals, setting aside the impugned order and directing the original authority to re-examine the case due to various lacunae. Issues regarding re-classification of services, taxability of consideration, errors in computation, scrutiny of agreements, eligibility for exemption, and imposition of penalties were addressed. The tribunal emphasized the need for proper reasoning and scrutiny of agreements, documentation, and compliance with the Finance Act. The original authority was instructed to complete proceedings within three months, considering the prolonged pendency of the case. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 23 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334918