https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334916 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the denial of the abatement claim under Rule 10 of the Pan Masala Packing Machines Rules. The appellant, a Gutkha manufacturer, was granted relief as the duty paid under the compounded levy scheme for a machine not in operation was deemed excessive. The Tribunal emphasized the applicability of abatement provisions when goods are not produced, aligning with relevant legal principles and granting consequential reliefs to the appellant. en-us Mon, 19 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 31 Jan 2018 14:12:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334916 The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the denial of the abatement claim under Rule 10 of the Pan Masala Packing Machines Rules. The appellant, a Gutkha manufacturer, was granted relief as the duty paid under the compounded levy scheme for a machine not in operation was deemed excessive. The Tribunal emphasized the applicability of abatement provisions when goods are not produced, aligning with relevant legal principles and granting consequential reliefs to the appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Mon, 19 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334916