<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 928 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334910</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand for recovery of CENVAT credit along with penalties and interest. The decision emphasized the importance of proper documentation, eligibility criteria for input services, and adherence to the rules governing CENVAT credit. The Tribunal also ruled that the demand made invoking an extended period without evidence of suppression was unsustainable, ultimately deeming the order as time-barred.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 11:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448850" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 928 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334910</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the demand for recovery of CENVAT credit along with penalties and interest. The decision emphasized the importance of proper documentation, eligibility criteria for input services, and adherence to the rules governing CENVAT credit. The Tribunal also ruled that the demand made invoking an extended period without evidence of suppression was unsustainable, ultimately deeming the order as time-barred.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334910</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>