<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 925 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334907</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals challenging duty demands raised by the Revenue against the appellant. Despite the appellant&#039;s payments totaling Rs. 1,10,45,464 against the demands, duty demands were confirmed without adjusting the amounts already paid. The Tribunal directed the Revenue to verify and reconcile the challans provided by the appellant, emphasizing that without contest on merit, further intervention was unnecessary. The appeals were allowed, highlighting the length of litigation and the stay order findings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2016 12:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448847" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 925 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334907</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed both appeals challenging duty demands raised by the Revenue against the appellant. Despite the appellant&#039;s payments totaling Rs. 1,10,45,464 against the demands, duty demands were confirmed without adjusting the amounts already paid. The Tribunal directed the Revenue to verify and reconcile the challans provided by the appellant, emphasizing that without contest on merit, further intervention was unnecessary. The appeals were allowed, highlighting the length of litigation and the stay order findings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334907</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>