<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 921 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334903</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the authorities&#039; decision to confirm the reversal of credit, interest payment, and penalty imposition on the appellant for availing credit on transferred materials under the Central Excise Act. The appellant&#039;s argument invoking Section 11A (2B) was rejected, emphasizing the clear application of the law and dismissing claims of inadvertent error. The Tribunal highlighted the need for diligent compliance with Cenvat Credit Rules, emphasizing the importance of accurate self-assessment to avoid penalties for duty evasion. The appeal was dismissed, emphasizing the significance of adhering to duty payment regulations to prevent fraud or suppression of facts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2016 13:37:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448842" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 921 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334903</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the authorities&#039; decision to confirm the reversal of credit, interest payment, and penalty imposition on the appellant for availing credit on transferred materials under the Central Excise Act. The appellant&#039;s argument invoking Section 11A (2B) was rejected, emphasizing the clear application of the law and dismissing claims of inadvertent error. The Tribunal highlighted the need for diligent compliance with Cenvat Credit Rules, emphasizing the importance of accurate self-assessment to avoid penalties for duty evasion. The appeal was dismissed, emphasizing the significance of adhering to duty payment regulations to prevent fraud or suppression of facts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334903</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>