<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 919 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334901</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand confirmation and allowed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of accurate factual considerations in show cause notices. It highlighted the necessity for alignment between allegations and the actual circumstances of the case, stressing the significance of a sound legal basis for demands raised by the Department in tax matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2016 13:35:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 919 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334901</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the demand confirmation and allowed the appeal, emphasizing the importance of accurate factual considerations in show cause notices. It highlighted the necessity for alignment between allegations and the actual circumstances of the case, stressing the significance of a sound legal basis for demands raised by the Department in tax matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334901</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>