https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334894 The Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to a refund under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rule 2004 for goods cleared under UT-1, despite availing drawback and rebate claims for other consignments. The Commissioner's decision to deny the refund was overturned, emphasizing that different consignments could be cleared under various schemes without affecting the refund eligibility. The matter was remanded for the correct quantification of the refund amount, with the appellant given the opportunity to provide necessary documentation. The adjudication was to be completed within two months, concluding the appeal through remand. en-us Tue, 01 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 10 Feb 2017 13:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334894 The Tribunal held that the appellant was entitled to a refund under Rule 5 of the Cenvat Credit Rule 2004 for goods cleared under UT-1, despite availing drawback and rebate claims for other consignments. The Commissioner's decision to deny the refund was overturned, emphasizing that different consignments could be cleared under various schemes without affecting the refund eligibility. The matter was remanded for the correct quantification of the refund amount, with the appellant given the opportunity to provide necessary documentation. The adjudication was to be completed within two months, concluding the appeal through remand. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 01 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334894