<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 902 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334884</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of the imported car due to lack of required license but reduced the redemption fine to Rs. 2,00,000 and penalty to Rs. 50,000, finding the initial amounts disproportionate to the car&#039;s value. The Tribunal deemed the modified fines as meeting the ends of justice, disposing of the appeal by adjusting the redemption fine and penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2016 14:10:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448816" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 902 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334884</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the confiscation of the imported car due to lack of required license but reduced the redemption fine to Rs. 2,00,000 and penalty to Rs. 50,000, finding the initial amounts disproportionate to the car&#039;s value. The Tribunal deemed the modified fines as meeting the ends of justice, disposing of the appeal by adjusting the redemption fine and penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334884</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>