<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 984 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188259</link>
    <description>Interim injunctions restraining alienation and construction on suit land were set aside because affected owners and transferees were not given an effective hearing, and the orders were made without recorded reasons. The Court emphasised that interlocutory relief must satisfy the settled tests of prima facie case, balance of convenience and inconvenience, and irreparable injury. It also noted the plaintiff&#039;s prolonged silence and the equitable position of transferees, while recognising only limited protection under lis pendens. The restraint against third-party transferees could not be maintained, and the earlier order was restored.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 28 Dec 2023 10:43:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448805" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 984 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188259</link>
      <description>Interim injunctions restraining alienation and construction on suit land were set aside because affected owners and transferees were not given an effective hearing, and the orders were made without recorded reasons. The Court emphasised that interlocutory relief must satisfy the settled tests of prima facie case, balance of convenience and inconvenience, and irreparable injury. It also noted the plaintiff&#039;s prolonged silence and the equitable position of transferees, while recognising only limited protection under lis pendens. The restraint against third-party transferees could not be maintained, and the earlier order was restored.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188259</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>