https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188257 The High Court appeal was held competent because the firm had not been shown to be dissolved; it had only been reconstituted, and the partner who acted was part of the original contracting firm, so the later re-registration in the same name did not defeat standing. Interim protection under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act was refused because the nature and enforceability of the agency arrangement and power of attorney were disputed matters for arbitration, and the agreement was not shown to be clearly specifically enforceable at the interlocutory stage. Section 9 relief was treated as governed by established principles for interim injunctions and equitable interim protection, including the limits reflected in the Specific Relief Act. en-us Thu, 17 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 20 Jan 2024 10:34:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188257 The High Court appeal was held competent because the firm had not been shown to be dissolved; it had only been reconstituted, and the partner who acted was part of the original contracting firm, so the later re-registration in the same name did not defeat standing. Interim protection under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act was refused because the nature and enforceability of the agency arrangement and power of attorney were disputed matters for arbitration, and the agreement was not shown to be clearly specifically enforceable at the interlocutory stage. Section 9 relief was treated as governed by established principles for interim injunctions and equitable interim protection, including the limits reflected in the Specific Relief Act. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 17 May 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188257