https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188254 Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act does not displace the ordinary principles for interim injunctions; the court must still assess prima facie entitlement, balance of convenience, irreparable injury, and whether relief is just and convenient, with the law of specific relief remaining relevant. In the mining dispute, limited interim protection was considered appropriate to preserve the subject matter of arbitration by restraining third-party dealings in the same mining arrangement, while no injunction was warranted to stop the lease-holder from carrying on mining operations itself. The broad injunction was refused, and the matter was directed to proceed expeditiously in arbitration. en-us Tue, 10 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 16 Jan 2024 18:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188254 Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act does not displace the ordinary principles for interim injunctions; the court must still assess prima facie entitlement, balance of convenience, irreparable injury, and whether relief is just and convenient, with the law of specific relief remaining relevant. In the mining dispute, limited interim protection was considered appropriate to preserve the subject matter of arbitration by restraining third-party dealings in the same mining arrangement, while no injunction was warranted to stop the lease-holder from carrying on mining operations itself. The broad injunction was refused, and the matter was directed to proceed expeditiously in arbitration. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 10 Jul 2007 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188254