https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188243 An election petition presented on the last day of the 45-day limitation period after court hours was treated as valid when the designated Judge was still available and the petitioner had done all that was required to present it. The limitation period was held to run until the expiry of the final day, unless the governing law clearly provides otherwise. High Court procedural rules could not curtail the substantive statutory period, and the receipt of the petition was treated as a ministerial act rather than a condition defeating a timely filing. en-us Fri, 11 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 13 May 2024 12:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188243 An election petition presented on the last day of the 45-day limitation period after court hours was treated as valid when the designated Judge was still available and the petitioner had done all that was required to present it. The limitation period was held to run until the expiry of the final day, unless the governing law clearly provides otherwise. High Court procedural rules could not curtail the substantive statutory period, and the receipt of the petition was treated as a ministerial act rather than a condition defeating a timely filing. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 11 Mar 2005 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188243