https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188232 An amendment to the university statute that inserted an exclusive course restriction and curtailed existing centres was treated as impermissibly narrowing the institution's educational mandate and as trenching on the higher-education and standards field already occupied by the UGC framework; that restriction and its proviso were invalid. By contrast, the amended procedure for appointing the Chancellor, requiring a panel and State Government approval, was regarded as preserving the Board of Management's role and not destroying the University's essential autonomy, so that reform was upheld. en-us Wed, 03 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 Mar 2017 12:17:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188232 An amendment to the university statute that inserted an exclusive course restriction and curtailed existing centres was treated as impermissibly narrowing the institution's educational mandate and as trenching on the higher-education and standards field already occupied by the UGC framework; that restriction and its proviso were invalid. By contrast, the amended procedure for appointing the Chancellor, requiring a panel and State Government approval, was regarded as preserving the Board of Management's role and not destroying the University's essential autonomy, so that reform was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 03 Jul 2013 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188232