<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2007 (1) TMI 598 - Delhi High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188231</link>
    <description>The High Court criticized the lack of consistency in assessments by the Revenue regarding the classification of income as salary or business income for the Assessee over different assessment years. Despite initial variations, recent assessments favored categorizing the income as salary income. The Court emphasized the importance of maintaining a consistent approach in assessments and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, stating it did not raise any substantial legal question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2016 15:35:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448728" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2007 (1) TMI 598 - Delhi High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188231</link>
      <description>The High Court criticized the lack of consistency in assessments by the Revenue regarding the classification of income as salary or business income for the Assessee over different assessment years. Despite initial variations, recent assessments favored categorizing the income as salary income. The Court emphasized the importance of maintaining a consistent approach in assessments and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, stating it did not raise any substantial legal question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jan 2007 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>