<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 874 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334856</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision, allowing the refund with consequential relief. It determined that turnover for services provided/exported before 1.4.2012 should be deducted for refund calculation under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules 2004. Additionally, the Tribunal found the refund claim filed on 26.4.2013 for consideration received on 9.4.2012 to be timely, in accordance with Section 11B requirements. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirmed the judgment on 22/03/2016.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2016 15:21:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448723" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 874 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334856</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision, allowing the refund with consequential relief. It determined that turnover for services provided/exported before 1.4.2012 should be deducted for refund calculation under Rule 5 of Cenvat Credit Rules 2004. Additionally, the Tribunal found the refund claim filed on 26.4.2013 for consideration received on 9.4.2012 to be timely, in accordance with Section 11B requirements. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and affirmed the judgment on 22/03/2016.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334856</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>