<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 866 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334848</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and partially allowed the respondent&#039;s cross objection, holding that the respondent was entitled to cenvat credit for the specified period without any penalty. The judgment clarified the applicability of the user test for structural items and the retrospective nature of certain provisions, providing relief to the respondent in terms of cenvat credit and penalty imposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2016 12:58:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448710" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 866 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334848</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal and partially allowed the respondent&#039;s cross objection, holding that the respondent was entitled to cenvat credit for the specified period without any penalty. The judgment clarified the applicability of the user test for structural items and the retrospective nature of certain provisions, providing relief to the respondent in terms of cenvat credit and penalty imposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334848</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>