<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2000 (2) TMI 11 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5788</link>
    <description>The SC held that City Compensatory Allowance (CCA), Dearness Allowance (DA), and House Rent Allowance (HRA) are taxable income under Section 17 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court interpreted &quot;profits in lieu of salary&quot; broadly, ruling that any payment received by an employee from an employer constitutes taxable salary income, regardless of whether it relates to the employer&#039;s actual profits. The court emphasized that the Act provides an inclusive definition of &quot;salary&quot; and that taxation depends on receipt, not the purpose or utilization of the allowance. Appeals by Revenue were allowed; employee appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2025 17:24:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44871" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2000 (2) TMI 11 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5788</link>
      <description>The SC held that City Compensatory Allowance (CCA), Dearness Allowance (DA), and House Rent Allowance (HRA) are taxable income under Section 17 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court interpreted &quot;profits in lieu of salary&quot; broadly, ruling that any payment received by an employee from an employer constitutes taxable salary income, regardless of whether it relates to the employer&#039;s actual profits. The court emphasized that the Act provides an inclusive definition of &quot;salary&quot; and that taxation depends on receipt, not the purpose or utilization of the allowance. Appeals by Revenue were allowed; employee appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Feb 2000 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5788</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>