<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 862 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334844</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision to confiscate goods removed without payment of duty and demand Central Excise duty, interest, and penalty for past clandestine clearances. The appeal was dismissed for lacking merit, affirming the confiscation and financial obligations imposed on the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2016 12:57:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448705" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 862 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334844</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039;s decision to confiscate goods removed without payment of duty and demand Central Excise duty, interest, and penalty for past clandestine clearances. The appeal was dismissed for lacking merit, affirming the confiscation and financial obligations imposed on the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334844</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>