<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 849 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334831</link>
    <description>Reversal of Modvat credit before export satisfied condition V(A) of Notification No. 203/92-Cus because the substantive requirement was that input-stage credit should not be availed. The credit was reversed at the time of export and that reversal was endorsed on the AR4, with a certificate produced from the jurisdictional Superintendent. The only objection was that the certificate was not issued by the Assistant Commissioner, but that did not affect the admitted fact of reversal. The exemption could not be denied on a merely formal objection to the certifying authority where the substantive condition had been met.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2017 12:56:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448688" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 849 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334831</link>
      <description>Reversal of Modvat credit before export satisfied condition V(A) of Notification No. 203/92-Cus because the substantive requirement was that input-stage credit should not be availed. The credit was reversed at the time of export and that reversal was endorsed on the AR4, with a certificate produced from the jurisdictional Superintendent. The only objection was that the certificate was not issued by the Assistant Commissioner, but that did not affect the admitted fact of reversal. The exemption could not be denied on a merely formal objection to the certifying authority where the substantive condition had been met.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334831</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>