https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334825 The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, stating that goods supplied or procured in the name of the President of India should be treated as sold to the Government, entitling the petitioner to benefits under Section 8(4) of the CST Act. The impugned orders were quashed, and the case was remanded to the Assessing Authority for re-examination based on the Court's observations regarding the interpretation of the term "Government" in the context of the statute. en-us Wed, 07 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Nov 2016 11:51:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334825 The Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, stating that goods supplied or procured in the name of the President of India should be treated as sold to the Government, entitling the petitioner to benefits under Section 8(4) of the CST Act. The impugned orders were quashed, and the case was remanded to the Assessing Authority for re-examination based on the Court's observations regarding the interpretation of the term "Government" in the context of the statute. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Wed, 07 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334825