https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188193 The Tribunal's interpretation of Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 was upheld as correct, and no substantial question of law was found to arise for consideration. The appeal therefore failed because the challenge did not disclose any legal issue warranting interference. en-us Fri, 12 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Nov 2016 11:46:35 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188193 The Tribunal's interpretation of Rule 8(3A) of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 was upheld as correct, and no substantial question of law was found to arise for consideration. The appeal therefore failed because the challenge did not disclose any legal issue warranting interference. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 12 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188193