<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 975 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188194</link>
    <description>Low tax effect led the SC to decline interference and dismiss the appeal without examining the merits. The Court expressly left the question of law open, so no substantive ruling was made on the service tax issue in dispute. The order is limited to the threshold ground of tax effect and does not determine the underlying legal controversy.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2016 11:46:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448672" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 975 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188194</link>
      <description>Low tax effect led the SC to decline interference and dismiss the appeal without examining the merits. The Court expressly left the question of law open, so no substantive ruling was made on the service tax issue in dispute. The order is limited to the threshold ground of tax effect and does not determine the underlying legal controversy.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188194</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>