<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (2) TMI 980 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188211</link>
    <description>The judgment upheld the first appellate order, dismissing the appeal and affirming that the assessment order was indeed barred by limitation. The detailed analysis covered the retrospective effect of the proviso, the relevance of court orders on the limitation period, and the deletion of additions without proper examination of merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2016 11:46:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448655" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (2) TMI 980 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188211</link>
      <description>The judgment upheld the first appellate order, dismissing the appeal and affirming that the assessment order was indeed barred by limitation. The detailed analysis covered the retrospective effect of the proviso, the relevance of court orders on the limitation period, and the deletion of additions without proper examination of merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188211</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>