https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334822 A writ petition under Article 226 challenging an order passed under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act was held not maintainable because an efficacious statutory remedy under Section 17 was available. The remedy under Section 17 covers grievances arising from measures taken after the Section 13(4) stage, including action under Section 14, and the High Court should ordinarily decline writ jurisdiction where the Act provides a complete redress mechanism before the Debt Recovery Tribunal. The petitioners were relegated to the Section 17 appeal. en-us Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 22 Nov 2016 11:25:36 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334822 A writ petition under Article 226 challenging an order passed under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act was held not maintainable because an efficacious statutory remedy under Section 17 was available. The remedy under Section 17 covers grievances arising from measures taken after the Section 13(4) stage, including action under Section 14, and the High Court should ordinarily decline writ jurisdiction where the Act provides a complete redress mechanism before the Debt Recovery Tribunal. The petitioners were relegated to the Section 17 appeal. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 16 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334822