https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334810 The appeal involved the denial of Cenvat credit on housekeeping services for maintaining factory premises. The Appellant argued the essential nature of these services for statutory compliance and cost addition to the final product. Referencing supportive decisions, the Appellant emphasized the importance of housekeeping services for manufacturing. The Judicial Member found merit in the Appellant's arguments, allowing Cenvat credit on housekeeping services. Relying on precedents and legal principles, the penalty was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the Appellant. en-us Tue, 06 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Nov 2016 23:12:13 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334810 The appeal involved the denial of Cenvat credit on housekeeping services for maintaining factory premises. The Appellant argued the essential nature of these services for statutory compliance and cost addition to the final product. Referencing supportive decisions, the Appellant emphasized the importance of housekeeping services for manufacturing. The Judicial Member found merit in the Appellant's arguments, allowing Cenvat credit on housekeeping services. Relying on precedents and legal principles, the penalty was set aside, and the appeal was allowed in favor of the Appellant. Case-Laws Central Excise Tue, 06 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334810