<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (5) TMI 5 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5779</link>
    <description>Weighted deduction under section 35B(1)(b) was not available for expenditure on foreign indenting business where the relevant services were rendered in India. The governing principle was that export markets development allowance cannot be claimed for commission or similar outgoings incurred in India merely because the activity has an overseas business element. On that reasoning, the assessee&#039;s claim failed and the allowance was disallowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2018 15:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=44862" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (5) TMI 5 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5779</link>
      <description>Weighted deduction under section 35B(1)(b) was not available for expenditure on foreign indenting business where the relevant services were rendered in India. The governing principle was that export markets development allowance cannot be claimed for commission or similar outgoings incurred in India merely because the activity has an overseas business element. On that reasoning, the assessee&#039;s claim failed and the allowance was disallowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=5779</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>