<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 821 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334803</link>
    <description>Selective exercise of an exemption option under Notification No. 1/93-C.E. was not permissible where the manufacturer continued concessional clearances for other goods arising from the same integrated manufacturing process; once the option was exercised, normal duty had to apply to all subsequent clearances in that financial year. The demand was also held within limitation because the classification list was under challenge and had not been finally accepted as conclusive, so timely notices were not defeated by a plea of prospectivity.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2018 12:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448617" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 821 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334803</link>
      <description>Selective exercise of an exemption option under Notification No. 1/93-C.E. was not permissible where the manufacturer continued concessional clearances for other goods arising from the same integrated manufacturing process; once the option was exercised, normal duty had to apply to all subsequent clearances in that financial year. The demand was also held within limitation because the classification list was under challenge and had not been finally accepted as conclusive, so timely notices were not defeated by a plea of prospectivity.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334803</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>