https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188184 A writ challenge to an anti-dumping duty notification was not entertained because the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 provides a statutory appeal to the Tribunal. The court treated the alternative appellate remedy as an effective bar to writ jurisdiction and rejected heavy pendency before the Tribunal as sufficient ground to bypass that remedy. It noted that the petitioner could instead seek expeditious disposal from the Tribunal after filing an appeal. The writ petition was therefore dismissed as not maintainable, leaving the petitioner to pursue the statutory appellate process. en-us Fri, 13 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 18 May 2017 11:26:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188184 A writ challenge to an anti-dumping duty notification was not entertained because the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 provides a statutory appeal to the Tribunal. The court treated the alternative appellate remedy as an effective bar to writ jurisdiction and rejected heavy pendency before the Tribunal as sufficient ground to bypass that remedy. It noted that the petitioner could instead seek expeditious disposal from the Tribunal after filing an appeal. The writ petition was therefore dismissed as not maintainable, leaving the petitioner to pursue the statutory appellate process. Case-Laws Customs Fri, 13 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188184