<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Customs House Agent Case: Commissioner of Customs Fails to Properly Exercise Authority Under CHALR 2004, Regulation 22(7).</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=32150</link>
    <description>Proceedings against the CHA - there is no provisions in CHALR, 2004 to appoint second enquiry officers but Regulation 22(7) only gives power to the Ld. Commissioner of Customs to consider the report submitted by enquiry officers and taken the decision thereon which the Ld. Commissioner failed to do so - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2016 14:01:14 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2016 14:01:14 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448589" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Customs House Agent Case: Commissioner of Customs Fails to Properly Exercise Authority Under CHALR 2004, Regulation 22(7).</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=32150</link>
      <description>Proceedings against the CHA - there is no provisions in CHALR, 2004 to appoint second enquiry officers but Regulation 22(7) only gives power to the Ld. Commissioner of Customs to consider the report submitted by enquiry officers and taken the decision thereon which the Ld. Commissioner failed to do so - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2016 14:01:14 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=32150</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>