<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 816 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334798</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order revoking the Customs House Agent license and forfeiting the security deposit. The appellant succeeded on the issues of compliance with time limits and the appointment of a second enquiry officer. The Tribunal found that the failure to adhere to the time limits rendered the order unsustainable, and the appointment of a second enquiry officer was deemed unauthorized. As a result, the appellant obtained consequential relief with the impugned order overturned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2016 13:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448585" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 816 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334798</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the impugned order revoking the Customs House Agent license and forfeiting the security deposit. The appellant succeeded on the issues of compliance with time limits and the appointment of a second enquiry officer. The Tribunal found that the failure to adhere to the time limits rendered the order unsustainable, and the appointment of a second enquiry officer was deemed unauthorized. As a result, the appellant obtained consequential relief with the impugned order overturned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334798</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>