<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 810 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334792</link>
    <description>The Court dismissed the challenge to the encumbrance certificate and property attachment due to unpaid dues. It emphasized the petitioner&#039;s duty to verify dues before property purchase and noted the lack of communication and records on the petitioner&#039;s part. The Court found evidence indicating the petitioner&#039;s receipt of notices, casting doubt on their claim of non-communication. The first respondent was directed to provide assessment order copies, but the Court declined to set aside the recovery notice or lift the property attachment solely based on the petitioner&#039;s assertions. The writ petitions were disposed of without costs, advising the petitioner to seek legal remedies upon receiving the documents.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2016 13:53:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448579" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 810 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334792</link>
      <description>The Court dismissed the challenge to the encumbrance certificate and property attachment due to unpaid dues. It emphasized the petitioner&#039;s duty to verify dues before property purchase and noted the lack of communication and records on the petitioner&#039;s part. The Court found evidence indicating the petitioner&#039;s receipt of notices, casting doubt on their claim of non-communication. The first respondent was directed to provide assessment order copies, but the Court declined to set aside the recovery notice or lift the property attachment solely based on the petitioner&#039;s assertions. The writ petitions were disposed of without costs, advising the petitioner to seek legal remedies upon receiving the documents.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334792</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>