<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 804 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334786</link>
    <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the applicant assessee on both issues, holding that the amendment to Section 214 of the Income Tax Act was applicable and that the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax under section 263 was not justified. The Court emphasized that the amendment was procedural and applied to all pending proceedings, entitling the applicant to interest under the amended provision. Consequently, the Court overturned the Tribunal&#039;s decision and disposed of the Reference with no order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2016 13:50:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448571" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 804 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334786</link>
      <description>The High Court ruled in favor of the applicant assessee on both issues, holding that the amendment to Section 214 of the Income Tax Act was applicable and that the order passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax under section 263 was not justified. The Court emphasized that the amendment was procedural and applied to all pending proceedings, entitling the applicant to interest under the amended provision. Consequently, the Court overturned the Tribunal&#039;s decision and disposed of the Reference with no order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334786</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>