<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 802 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334784</link>
    <description>The Court overturned the Tribunal&#039;s decision and reinstated the CIT (Appeals) view, ruling in favor of the assessee against the department. The Court found that the Assessing Officer unjustly rejected the books of accounts without evidence of irregularities, leading to a favorable outcome for the assessee. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, resolving the issues in favor of the assessee for the assessment years in question.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2016 13:50:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448569" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 802 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334784</link>
      <description>The Court overturned the Tribunal&#039;s decision and reinstated the CIT (Appeals) view, ruling in favor of the assessee against the department. The Court found that the Assessing Officer unjustly rejected the books of accounts without evidence of irregularities, leading to a favorable outcome for the assessee. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, resolving the issues in favor of the assessee for the assessment years in question.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Nov 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334784</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>