https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188169 Minority educational institutions retain the constitutional right to establish and administer institutions of their choice under Article 30(1), but that protection does not bar reasonable regulation to secure educational standards, discipline, fair service conditions, inspection, and efficient management. The text explains that such regulation is valid so long as it does not transfer administration to an outside authority or create an unguided veto over management. Section 3 was described as non-compulsory for minority schools because takeover depended on a voluntary unconditional offer, while Section 18 was treated as regulatory and preserving minority control. The challenge to the Bihar Act therefore failed, and the impugned provisions were upheld as constitutionally valid. en-us Thu, 26 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 21 Nov 2016 10:42:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188169 Minority educational institutions retain the constitutional right to establish and administer institutions of their choice under Article 30(1), but that protection does not bar reasonable regulation to secure educational standards, discipline, fair service conditions, inspection, and efficient management. The text explains that such regulation is valid so long as it does not transfer administration to an outside authority or create an unguided veto over management. Section 3 was described as non-compulsory for minority schools because takeover depended on a voluntary unconditional offer, while Section 18 was treated as regulatory and preserving minority control. The challenge to the Bihar Act therefore failed, and the impugned provisions were upheld as constitutionally valid. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 26 Nov 1987 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=188169