https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334772 The High Court declined jurisdiction to entertain an appeal against a CESTAT order, emphasizing the appellant's location in Chhattisgarh did not preclude filing in the High Court at Chhattisgarh. The appellant cited relevant decisions supporting High Court jurisdiction, but the Court maintained it was not the appropriate forum. The appellant was directed to seek relief in the appropriate court as per the law, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and application. en-us Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Jan 2017 10:39:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334772 The High Court declined jurisdiction to entertain an appeal against a CESTAT order, emphasizing the appellant's location in Chhattisgarh did not preclude filing in the High Court at Chhattisgarh. The appellant cited relevant decisions supporting High Court jurisdiction, but the Court maintained it was not the appropriate forum. The appellant was directed to seek relief in the appropriate court as per the law, leading to the dismissal of the appeal and application. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 27 Jul 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334772