<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (11) TMI 787 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334769</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the lower authorities in the case involving alleged misdeclaration of taxable service value by M/s. Engineers Enterprises. The penalty of Rs. 9,67,373 under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, was confirmed, along with interest. The Commissioner (Appeals) supported the penalty imposition and the 25% penalty payment option exercised by the respondent, rejecting the department&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal concurred, emphasizing the importance of rectifying errors promptly and cooperating with tax authorities. The department&#039;s appeal was rejected, affirming the penalty imposition.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2017 14:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=448529" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (11) TMI 787 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334769</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the decision of the lower authorities in the case involving alleged misdeclaration of taxable service value by M/s. Engineers Enterprises. The penalty of Rs. 9,67,373 under Section 78 of the Finance Act, 1994, was confirmed, along with interest. The Commissioner (Appeals) supported the penalty imposition and the 25% penalty payment option exercised by the respondent, rejecting the department&#039;s appeal. The Tribunal concurred, emphasizing the importance of rectifying errors promptly and cooperating with tax authorities. The department&#039;s appeal was rejected, affirming the penalty imposition.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334769</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>