https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334757 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondent, holding that they were not required to pay 10% of the total price of exempted goods for not maintaining separate records of furnace oil use in manufacturing dutiable and exempted products. The Tribunal found that the respondent complied with Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and did not avail credit on oil used for exempted products. The demand was deemed unsustainable, and the appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, upholding the decision in favor of the respondent. en-us Thu, 06 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 19 Nov 2016 16:58:17 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334757 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the respondent, holding that they were not required to pay 10% of the total price of exempted goods for not maintaining separate records of furnace oil use in manufacturing dutiable and exempted products. The Tribunal found that the respondent complied with Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and did not avail credit on oil used for exempted products. The demand was deemed unsustainable, and the appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, upholding the decision in favor of the respondent. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 06 Oct 2016 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=334757